docs: reconcile the vt-compliance record rule with doc-cascade's default-no-record gate #390

Closed
opened 2026-09-25 00:48:16 +09:00 by natsukium · 1 comment
Owner

docs/explanation/protocols/vt-compliance.md (~66-67) says "any added or removed sequence is a breaking change and needs its rationale recorded in this doc". The add-escape-sequence skill echoes this. It conflicts with doc-cascade's "Default to no record" gate. docs/explanation/protocols/landscape.md is already the home for admission decisions.

Pick one policy:

  • (a) narrow the vt-compliance rule to admission decisions that pass the record gate, recorded in landscape.md; or
  • (b) keep it, and state it in doc-cascade as an explicit exception.

Then align the skill.

`docs/explanation/protocols/vt-compliance.md` (~66-67) says "any added or removed sequence is a breaking change and needs its rationale recorded in this doc". The add-escape-sequence skill echoes this. It conflicts with doc-cascade's "Default to no record" gate. `docs/explanation/protocols/landscape.md` is already the home for admission decisions. Pick one policy: - (a) narrow the vt-compliance rule to admission decisions that pass the record gate, recorded in landscape.md; or - (b) keep it, and state it in doc-cascade as an explicit exception. Then align the skill.
Author
Owner

Decision: (a). Narrow the vt-compliance rule to admission decisions that pass doc-cascade's record gate, recorded in docs/explanation/protocols/landscape.md; align the add-escape-sequence skill.

Decision: (a). Narrow the vt-compliance rule to admission decisions that pass doc-cascade's record gate, recorded in `docs/explanation/protocols/landscape.md`; align the add-escape-sequence skill.
Commenting is not possible because the repository is archived.
No description provided.