docs: support-matrix legend vs DECSCLM and the modifiable-but-unimplemented DEC modes #391

Closed

opened 2026-09-25 00:48:16 +09:00 by natsukium · 1 comment

natsukium commented

2026-09-25 00:48:16 +09:00

Owner

The support-matrix.md legend and the vt-compliance "Consumed without effect" set disagree at the edges:

The legend (~18-19) says an input the parser consumes and drops is ⚠️, even where the capability is a non-goal. Yet DECSCLM (CSI ? 4 h/l) is 🚫, although it is consumed, soft-tracked (felis-grid/src/sink.rs ~885-889) and DECRQM-modifiable (KNOWN_MODIFIABLE_DEC_MODES, modes.rs ~28). That is the same residue as the ⚠️ ?12 row.
docs/reference/protocols/vt-compliance.md (~262) calls "Consumed without effect" the complete set, but ?4, ?18, ?19, ?34, … (listed at ~235) are absent from it.

Decide either to add a consumed-without-effect row for the modifiable-but-unimplemented DEC modes (and mark DECSCLM ⚠️), or to reword the legend so that 🚫 can coexist with parser consumption.

The `support-matrix.md` legend and the vt-compliance "Consumed without effect" set disagree at the edges: - The legend (~18-19) says an input the parser consumes and drops is ⚠️, even where the capability is a non-goal. Yet DECSCLM (`CSI ? 4 h/l`) is 🚫, although it is consumed, soft-tracked (`felis-grid/src/sink.rs` ~885-889) and DECRQM-modifiable (`KNOWN_MODIFIABLE_DEC_MODES`, `modes.rs` ~28). That is the same residue as the ⚠️ `?12` row. - `docs/reference/protocols/vt-compliance.md` (~262) calls "Consumed without effect" the complete set, but `?4`, `?18`, `?19`, `?34`, … (listed at ~235) are absent from it. Decide either to add a consumed-without-effect row for the modifiable-but-unimplemented DEC modes (and mark DECSCLM ⚠️), or to reword the legend so that 🚫 can coexist with parser consumption.

natsukium added the

type/design

label

2026-09-25 00:48:16 +09:00

natsukium referenced this issue

2026-09-25 00:48:41 +09:00

docs: fix inconsistencies found by a tree-wide docs and skills audit #395

natsukium referenced this issue from a commit

2026-09-25 00:54:55 +09:00

docs: fix inconsistencies found by a tree-wide docs and skills audit (#395)

natsukium commented

2026-09-25 11:45:19 +09:00

Author

Owner

Decision: add a "consumed without effect" row for the modifiable-but-unimplemented DEC modes (?4, ?18, ?19, ?34, … as listed in vt-compliance.md) and mark DECSCLM ⚠️, keeping the legend's rule that anything the parser consumes and drops is ⚠️. Make the vt-compliance "complete set" list match.

Decision: add a "consumed without effect" row for the modifiable-but-unimplemented DEC modes (`?4`, `?18`, `?19`, `?34`, … as listed in vt-compliance.md) and mark DECSCLM ⚠️, keeping the legend's rule that anything the parser consumes and drops is ⚠️. Make the vt-compliance "complete set" list match.

natsukium referenced this issue from a pull request that will close it,

2026-09-25 12:00:05 +09:00

docs: list the modifiable-but-unimplemented DEC modes as tolerated #439

natsukium closed this issue

2026-09-25 12:30:20 +09:00

natsukium referenced this issue from a commit

2026-09-25 12:30:21 +09:00

docs: list the modifiable-but-unimplemented DEC modes as tolerated (#439)

Commenting is not possible because the repository is archived.